This paper is meant to discuss the book “The Communist Manifesto.” The Communist Manifesto was written by German theorists Friedrich Engels and Karl Marx in 1848. The work has four main parts. In the initial one, it discusses the Communists' approach of history and the relations among bourgeoisie and proletarians. The second section clarifies the relations among proletarians and communists. The third section deals with the flaws in other, prior socialist literature. The last part discusses the relations among the Communists and all other parties.
Basically, Marx and Engels thought that the time had come for the working-class individuals to fight against the richer ruling classes. Far more just and reasonable political system was required, and theorists thought they had the resolution. Engels and Marx outline the basic troubles of European society and administration, calling all who suffer under the existing regime to action. The three basic troubles of the economic system of capitalism are oligopolies and monopolies, boom and bust cycles, and the inequality between rich and poor people. However, even though administrations around the globe realize this, they still utilize this system as it is extremely productive, structured, and it creates wealth.
The Communist Manifesto reflects the efforts to clarify the aims of Communism and the theory underlying this movement. It declares that class struggles are the motivating power behind all historical evolvements. Class relations are defined by the era's means of production. Nevertheless, finally these relations cease to be in agreement with the evolving forces of production. This is when a revolution happens and a novel class appears as the ruling one. The process reflects March of history as driven by major economic forces. The Manifesto asserts that this evolvement is predictable, and that capitalism is intrinsically unbalanced. The communists promote this revolution. They argue the eradication of social classes cannot occur through reforms or alterations in administration.
Marx essentially misunderstood capitalism due to the failure to recognize that magnetism it would have to the lower classes. Whilst the divide between rich and poor preserves, proletarians not only do not criticize the rich for their prosperity, but, in fact, they tend to think that they or their children have a perfect opportunity of being rich themselves. Thus, this work led to passionate uprisings and enormous political alterations, for better and for worse. The Communist Manifesto is a fascinating read for anybody interested in the history of social and political change.